Now Viewing: Report Tag Poisoners
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 03/09/11 08:05PM
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...tag_history&id=693328 (evidence)
culprit: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=70806 (BESTialiTEA)
new report in a week! well, clearly a tag offense.
i am currently hunting "tagme" pictures, check to see if they've been wiped out or have sufficient relevent tags so that tagme is no longer needed
culprit: gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=70806 (BESTialiTEA)
new report in a week! well, clearly a tag offense.
i am currently hunting "tagme" pictures, check to see if they've been wiped out or have sufficient relevent tags so that tagme is no longer needed
Posted on: 04/11/11 01:02AM
ggzgg2 - gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=51973
Active since yesterday (2011/04/09), stripped tags from 103 pictures, almost all of them animated gifs, but leaves the 'gif'. Adds favorites like a normal user, but has a spammer's name.
I wonder if it's really just tagging fail, i.e. deleting everything unnecessary in the text entry field and then adding "gif" or "asian". Even though it's already there.
Active since yesterday (2011/04/09), stripped tags from 103 pictures, almost all of them animated gifs, but leaves the 'gif'. Adds favorites like a normal user, but has a spammer's name.
I wonder if it's really just tagging fail, i.e. deleting everything unnecessary in the text entry field and then adding "gif" or "asian". Even though it's already there.
Posted on: 04/19/11 04:35PM
Cypherpunks gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...mp;s=profile&id=24365 has been uploaded images with bare minimum tags.(that's fine) However, he/she always fails to label the image correctly as Explicit in every general case where applicable.
I already fixed an entire page of this. You can see by his tagging history how badly its done. If it was a few images, well... yeah. It's not. Notably, all of the pictures were Loli that I happened to have properly tagged.(I didn't know the series, so I could only do so much) I didn't know how to report the uploader him/herself though and I apoligize for not checking the rules clearer for that.
I already fixed an entire page of this. You can see by his tagging history how badly its done. If it was a few images, well... yeah. It's not. Notably, all of the pictures were Loli that I happened to have properly tagged.(I didn't know the series, so I could only do so much) I didn't know how to report the uploader him/herself though and I apoligize for not checking the rules clearer for that.
Posted on: 04/19/11 04:53PM
I had sent him a warning earlier today to tag his uploads or he'd get banned. I didn't know he screwed up the image ratings as well.
Posted on: 04/19/11 04:59PM
That he did. Anyway, I'll keep an eye out for anything on the long run.
However, I must ask this related to me possibly and accidentally being an offender. I have removed every instance of the Super_Smash_Bros. tag on anything that does not have a crossover from a seperate series. For exampe, seeing (Twilight Princess) Link and Toon Link together would just be Legend_Of_Zelda(or was it The_Legend_Of_Zelda? Eh, not biggie) is more of a Crossover than an actual Super_Smash_Bros. picture.
If it's considered to be Smash, I'll stop removing the tag.(another example is only Ike and Marth together that I've seen) In all technicalities, it's not Smash Bros. even if they only "canonically"(I'm using this term loosely) appeared together in that instance, but they could also appear in a Fanfiction together instead. Which would likewise be under the tag Fire_Emblem and not Super_Smash_Bros.
However, I must ask this related to me possibly and accidentally being an offender. I have removed every instance of the Super_Smash_Bros. tag on anything that does not have a crossover from a seperate series. For exampe, seeing (Twilight Princess) Link and Toon Link together would just be Legend_Of_Zelda(or was it The_Legend_Of_Zelda? Eh, not biggie) is more of a Crossover than an actual Super_Smash_Bros. picture.
If it's considered to be Smash, I'll stop removing the tag.(another example is only Ike and Marth together that I've seen) In all technicalities, it's not Smash Bros. even if they only "canonically"(I'm using this term loosely) appeared together in that instance, but they could also appear in a Fanfiction together instead. Which would likewise be under the tag Fire_Emblem and not Super_Smash_Bros.
Posted on: 04/19/11 05:13PM
The Super_Smash_Bros. tag should be used when characters included in the game are together in an image, as far as I can work out. So I'd cut that out.
Posted on: 04/19/11 05:20PM
Do you mean as in me stop removing the tag or to remove the tag like I've been doing? The wording is mixing me up.
I was going by a small technical fact. If only Fire_Emblem characters are together(even if they never met in-universe), it's still Fire_Emblem. Atleast, that's MY definition, respectively.
I was going by a small technical fact. If only Fire_Emblem characters are together(even if they never met in-universe), it's still Fire_Emblem. Atleast, that's MY definition, respectively.
Posted on: 04/19/11 06:00PM
internetlovemachine said:
The Super_Smash_Bros. tag should be used when characters included in the game are together in an image.
The Super_Smash_Bros. tag should be used when characters included in the game are together in an image.
Or if the image has the SSB logo on it. Things are similar with Dissidia Final Fantasy.
Posted on: 04/19/11 06:06PM
Hydronix said:
Do you mean as in me stop removing the tag or to remove the tag like I've been doing? The wording is mixing me up.
I was going by a small technical fact. If only Fire_Emblem characters are together(even if they never met in-universe), it's still Fire_Emblem. Atleast, that's MY definition, respectively.
Do you mean as in me stop removing the tag or to remove the tag like I've been doing? The wording is mixing me up.
I was going by a small technical fact. If only Fire_Emblem characters are together(even if they never met in-universe), it's still Fire_Emblem. Atleast, that's MY definition, respectively.
Stop removing as you've been doing.
You should tag the original series the character was in as well as S_S_B.
An image of just Fire_Emblem characters should only be tagged Fire_Emblem.
An image of a Fire_Emblem character that was in SSB solo should only be Fire_Emblem.
An image of a Fire_Emblem character with, say, Link should be dual tagged with Fire_Emblem and S_S_B, by the looks of it.
That's how I'd stick to using the tag.
Posted on: 04/19/11 06:13PM
Actually, Internetlovermachine, that's what I've been doing. If only Ike and Marth are together, I made sure the SSB tag was removed. I'm sorry if I've been confusing. If I saw the SSB symbol, or anything to indicate it was SSB in general.(items specific to the series, the symbol, 1P, etc, I kept the tag)
@Jedi1357: It's a slightly different situation, since Super_Smash_Bros. is kind of completely different from crossovers.
Let me find an example of one that I kept Fire_Emblem only. I'll edit it in in a few minutes. Here it is: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=792030 This post was originally tagged Super_Smash_Bros. I solely removed it.(and somebody reverted it back) I re-reverted it back(manually, but whatever). Anyway, I unfortunately do not know ALL of the japanese tags so should I just replace SSB with Tagme then? Just to differentiate the confusion?
@Jedi1357: It's a slightly different situation, since Super_Smash_Bros. is kind of completely different from crossovers.
Let me find an example of one that I kept Fire_Emblem only. I'll edit it in in a few minutes. Here it is: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=792030 This post was originally tagged Super_Smash_Bros. I solely removed it.(and somebody reverted it back) I re-reverted it back(manually, but whatever). Anyway, I unfortunately do not know ALL of the japanese tags so should I just replace SSB with Tagme then? Just to differentiate the confusion?
Add Reply