Blacklist almost all hetero-hetani without blacklisting futa?

This may sound crazy to some, but as a straight male, I actually prefer yuri, solo/multiple girls, and futa over anything else. Male on female doesn't seem to interest me at the sightless (unless it's supposed to be me of course, lol). I just personally find yuri to be more heartwarming and enjoyable and would rather not have some guy getting in the way.

Try blacklisting things like

male 1boy 2boys 3boys

That looks like what you want. Just keep in mind it won't work on posts that aren't properly tagged and there may be many.

And also male_hand since a lot of pictures just show hands, or just a penis, in which case there is no way to know whether it's hetero or not without more context, although trying to hide the individual with the penis behind the girl or out of the frame is usually characteristic of heterosexual rather than futa porn.

Mind you, the way the tag wiki currently defines male is largely incompatible with this use ("Images featuring only male characters, or with an overwhelming emphasis on male characters.") ILM said on the forum a while ago that you're not supposed to use the male tag if there is just a set of hips and a penis visible in the picture.

I would sure like it if the "straight" tag was changed to hetero so it's not so POV, and applied to pictures as consistently as the yaoi and yuri tags. In fact, I was building up the hetero tag and had it up to 350+ pictures when Jedi cleared it out without any (public) discussion, which I was disappointed by.

As it is, it feels like people who don't want to see any yaoi or futa, and say so repeatedly on the forum, are being accomodated, while people who want to easily screen out hetero pictures without screening out either yaoi or yuri or being obligated to blacklist dance, are being told "STFU, you're a minority."

This despite the fact that there would be a fair amount of demand and use for a hetero tag, and it wouldn't cost the site much to implement; in fact, having to screen out just one tag rather than 4+ may be more computationally efficient. It's certainly more efficient in terms of user time.

Thanks for the helpful responses. I'll be sure to keep those in mind.