Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
All removed for the same reason by the same moderator. I could understand the third one because it's the laziest made, but the other two are fine. One isn't even an edit.
I don't see anything wrong with this one, seeing how both Dan and Gelbooru seem to tolerate similar content and this isn't against the terms of service or the Prohibited Content rules at all.
Overzealous moderation i guess....
Jerl
- Group: The Real Administrator - Total Posts: 6688
If we can tell that an image was edited without seeing the original, it is a poor edit, regardless of what the content is or what edits have been made. Both of the edited ones are very obviously edits, so they will not be restored.
The one you're claiming to not be an edit very much looks like an edit. If something looks like an edit and we can't find a source for it, we will assume that it is an edit, and that's what we did here since you didn't include a source on that post (or any of your uploads). We will not restore that image unless you can provide a source showing that the image is as the original artist intended.
We found the source on DeviantArt, all uploaded a few hours ago. They were all poor edits, same hat and everything. The owner of the site has purged those images from the site. Please do not post any more images from that "artist".