Messed up the title. WhoopsPosted on: 11/24/23 01:04AM
Hee-Ho said:
Ironic considering you missed my point as well.
"A type of fashion" and the "pointless picture" are relevant, Lolita has many type of subthemes, one which is classic, sweet and gothic. Lolita isn't just gothic, it has alot of themes.
Nice, the first time you blamed the show runners for "refining" the term loli while your spoiler pretty much aligns with my argument.
Keep entertain me.
You can't be serious. On either of those points. You've got nothing.
You didn't read what I wrote initially and then brought it up like I never mentioned it before. Hence rendering your points made, pointless. Adding up to what exactly? Your rebuttal that Lolita fashion has many branched off styles. Doesn't negate my already acknowledgement of it's existence. It's like me saying, "Wizards of the Coast owns many TCG(tradingcardgame) brands, like Magic the Gathering. And you sliding in and saying, "But You do realize they own Pokemon and YuGiOh?
It was implied already. Thanks captain.
And you think my spoiler supports your argument how? We never touched on mental ages. So that doesn't work. I only admitted/acknowledged that my spoiler creates a tiny hole in the point I was making. In the spirit of fairness. When it came to defining the term lolita and how it's recognized today.
I'll even admit that I fckd up the title(probably was tired from work). Something nobody caught. It's Alita Battle Angel and Battle Angel: Alita for the anime/manga. Leon the Professional might've been a slightly better example. Since the international version supposedly has "lolita" vibes. In addition to that, the director married/knocked up a 16 y.o. child actress they met only five years prior. But the movie/story is about a 12 y.o. played by 12 y.o. Natalie Portman. Who is take in by a male assassin, after her family is murdered.
Lastly the showrunners of Edgerunners didn't refine squat. They only added to the confusion. Hence Mderms' original comment.