Now Viewing: Is uploading AI generated art allowed? (Stable diffusion)
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Open
Pin
Is uploading AI generated art allowed? (Stable diffusion)
Posted on: 01/20/24 03:34PM
I play around with stable diffusion quite a bit and have created some rather decent images and before i start uploading them i was wondering about the consesus about them? do the site want them at all? or would allowing them too easily flood the site with crap?
Posted on: 01/20/24 03:38PM
If they find ANY AI artifact the post will be deleted. The art must be indistinguishable from human art to stay here.
Posted on: 01/20/24 03:46PM
Posted on: 01/20/24 04:10PM
Extremely strict. "Indistinguishable" is meant literally. It must be impossible to visually tell that an image was AI-generated for it to be allowed. If we can tell at all, even if it's something tiny in the background that most users would never even look at much less notice, it will be removed.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
Posted on: 01/20/24 04:10PM
The haaaaaandsssss
Posted on: 01/20/24 04:13PM
Then i know, Seems both me and AI will have to get better before i start posting here then. Thank you all for the answers.
edit:
Oh and incase anyone wonders and likes to play with stable diffusion, here are the settings for the image linked above:
prompt: photorealistic, masterpiece, finely detailed, (sharp focus), detailed eyes, full body, 1girl, seethrough, (large breasts:1.3), nsfw, subsurface scattering, pixar style, Princess_Peach, <lora:peach:0.6>, standing, detailed public, smiling, solo
Negative prompt: (EasyNegative, bad-hands-5, by bad-artist, bad_prompt_v2, bad anatomy, monochrome:1.1), body out of frame, extra fingers, fewer fingers, strange fingers, bad hand, error, mutations, misformed legs
Steps: 40, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 9, Seed: 1397097786, Size: 768x768, Model hash: 6e9284f3bc, Model: sciencemix8v2_FP16, VAE hash: df3c506e51, VAE: klF8Anime2VAE_klF8Anime2VAE.ckpt, Denoising strength: 0.55, Hires upscale: 1.5, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: Latent, Lora hashes: "peach: 9df486b130f3", Version: v1.6.0
edit:
Oh and incase anyone wonders and likes to play with stable diffusion, here are the settings for the image linked above:
prompt: photorealistic, masterpiece, finely detailed, (sharp focus), detailed eyes, full body, 1girl, seethrough, (large breasts:1.3), nsfw, subsurface scattering, pixar style, Princess_Peach, <lora:peach:0.6>, standing, detailed public, smiling, solo
Negative prompt: (EasyNegative, bad-hands-5, by bad-artist, bad_prompt_v2, bad anatomy, monochrome:1.1), body out of frame, extra fingers, fewer fingers, strange fingers, bad hand, error, mutations, misformed legs
Steps: 40, Sampler: Euler a, CFG scale: 9, Seed: 1397097786, Size: 768x768, Model hash: 6e9284f3bc, Model: sciencemix8v2_FP16, VAE hash: df3c506e51, VAE: klF8Anime2VAE_klF8Anime2VAE.ckpt, Denoising strength: 0.55, Hires upscale: 1.5, Hires steps: 20, Hires upscaler: Latent, Lora hashes: "peach: 9df486b130f3", Version: v1.6.0
Posted on: 01/20/24 04:26PM
Jerl said:
Extremely strict. "Indistinguishable" is meant literally. It must be impossible to visually tell that an image was AI-generated for it to be allowed. If we can tell at all, even if it's something tiny in the background that most users would never even look at much less notice, it will be removed.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
Extremely strict. "Indistinguishable" is meant literally. It must be impossible to visually tell that an image was AI-generated for it to be allowed. If we can tell at all, even if it's something tiny in the background that most users would never even look at much less notice, it will be removed.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
Oh, yeah you spotted lots more things than i did. Thank you for the feedback. seems i have some learning to do.
Posted on: 01/26/24 10:17PM
Jerl said:
Extremely strict. "Indistinguishable" is meant literally. It must be impossible to visually tell that an image was AI-generated for it to be allowed. If we can tell at all, even if it's something tiny in the background that most users would never even look at much less notice, it will be removed.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
Extremely strict. "Indistinguishable" is meant literally. It must be impossible to visually tell that an image was AI-generated for it to be allowed. If we can tell at all, even if it's something tiny in the background that most users would never even look at much less notice, it will be removed.
That image in particular has blatantly obvious AI artifacts that anyone could notice right in the foreground. Her hand, the "lace" around the bust of her dress, her necklace, her choker, her eyes, and her crown are all heavily artifacted. There are also lots of issues in the background.
Question about this. I believe I'm skilled enough at AI art creation, at this point, to be able to create pics that are truly indistinguishable (after hours of editing, inpainting, etc). Should they be tagged as AI generated, or simply uploaded without being tagged, so that others never know, if there truly are no artifacts?
Posted on: 01/26/24 11:20PM
Our Terms of Service require AI-generated or AI-assisted images to be tagged as such.
If you edited the image, then you would tag it "ai-assisted" instead of "ai-generated". These are mutually exclusive tags.
If you edited the image, then you would tag it "ai-assisted" instead of "ai-generated". These are mutually exclusive tags.
Posted on: 01/26/24 11:40PM
Jerl said:
Our Terms of Service require AI-generated or AI-assisted images to be tagged as such.
If you edited the image, then you would tag it "ai-assisted" instead of "ai-generated". These are mutually exclusive tags.
Our Terms of Service require AI-generated or AI-assisted images to be tagged as such.
If you edited the image, then you would tag it "ai-assisted" instead of "ai-generated". These are mutually exclusive tags.
Perfect, thanks
Add Reply