YuriLover51 commented at 2011-10-03 13:22:50 » #892824

Turn-A looks weird to me, I think O gundam should have been put here too

3 Points Flag

jhn1 commented at 2011-10-06 00:32:53 » #894940

And the Strike instead of Freedom

2 Points Flag

Strikey commented at 2011-10-07 04:49:06 » #895990

This image lacks in Strike Gundam.

nuff said

3 Points Flag

KING_OF_NIGERIA commented at 2011-10-12 18:01:14 » #900115

Turn A is fine. Freedom needs to be replaced by Victory or Shining.

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-10-19 17:23:24 » #904651

All of them look a bit edgy, but other than that it's fine. But I'll agree with YuriLover51. 0 Gundam should be there too.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-10-28 23:47:50 » #912774

0 gundam replacing turn A, strike replacing freedom
and this image will featuring all of the-basic-powered-gundams

8 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-11-24 07:26:50 » #934316

X replacing AGE would pretty fuckin awesome

4 Points Flag

OmegaZXA commented at 2012-03-26 01:08:40 » #1033165

I think it's meant to forecast AGE-1 through AGE-3. AGE-1 was all about different parts (Gundam and G-Flyer), and AGE-2 has shoulder cannons that turn into swords the size of energy wings (circa Moonlit Butterfly). So AGE-3 will probably have a massive arsenal to mirror Freedom.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2012-06-25 10:18:45 » #1101292

OmegaZXA, I've been using the tag OmegaZxA (different case of x) since 2004, but it seems you are the same as me relating to Gundam. Anyways, maybe freedom should be replaced by the Victory or V2. If this was a Sunrise-Cross drawing, maybe even GaoGaiGar, since Age-3 is made of massive addons directly to the core, instead of combine-able modules.

0 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2013-03-11 01:59:59 » #1280960

dafuq? all comments got hidden? must be something like gundam fanbase warfare were here..

5 Points Flag