uscottpwnd commented at 2009-05-07 18:57:27 » #49449

this looks badly done

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-05-09 10:26:29 » #726442

Looks better than some of the other work I've seen. But I think someone is missing.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-07-04 03:53:00 » #796724

It isn't 'badly done', it's just this artist's style (seen it before, but do not know the artist's name). I'm not a fan of how they do eyes, they always seem a little far apart, but that's my only gripe.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-09-03 17:12:52 » #867353

artist is usso, aka digital_knockout. Yeah, this is his style--the faces are kind of weird, he's very '80s influenced in his art style. But what's truly weird about his art are the inevitable gigantic objects the girls wind up shoving into their pussies.

1 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-09-03 17:24:27 » #867364

So if somebody draws a stickfigure and say that it is their style... that's okay? No, this is just badly done. It's not that the eyes are too far apart, it is that they are placed poorly in the face and it looked as if they are poor photoshop attempts. Inspired by the 80s? There was some really good art being done back then... This on the other hand is not good art. This image is crap.

1 Points Flag

TheHerald commented at 2013-02-25 00:33:38 » #1272011

You're assuming all artists must be anatomically correct to be good. For example, Picasso's art style is badly done using your definition. Just because you don't like something doesn't mean it's "badly done". If that were the case, almost all modern artists would be "badly done".

0 Points Flag