Edit | Leave a Comment | Favorite


More Like This: (Beta Temporary Feature)


User Comments:


Anonymous commented at 2009-10-13 03:37:28 » #129720

Realistic? I think "real" would be better.

3 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2010-06-25 12:10:20 » #344411

It's not real. xD; At first glance it seems real. Buuuut theeeen take a look at the texture of the things in the back. -Smacks Anon1-

6 Points Flag
Anonymous commented at 2012-01-26 23:08:56 » #987367

Ahem. Wow. I thought this was real as well.

2 Points Flag
IchigoRadiance commented at 2013-12-03 04:19:08 » #1447134

The tag rule for realistic says this should be considered photorealistic as opposed to just realistic.

The wiki definition under photorealistic says:

Posts so realistic that they could be mistaken for photographs except upon close inspection.

Use realistic for posts that feature naturalistic anatomy and shading but would not be mistaken for photographs.


This image could easily be mistaken for a photo, and in fact, as the comments here have shown, it has been mistaken at one point. So I changed the tag to photorealistic.

4 Points Flag