Now Viewing: [Tagging] Gardeners Guild: Discuss Tagging Here!
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 02/10/21 02:39PM
Shouldn't hot_spring be a deprecated tag? Or at least add onsen at the same time?
Posted on: 02/10/21 05:59PM
The kidnapped tag has 297 images and the kidnapping tag has 176. There's a wiki entry for kidnapping, so I think it's the correct one, so should all those images with kidnapped be changed to kidnapping? There's three pages of results for kidnapping -kidnapped, so there's a fair bit that aren't tagged with both.
Posted on: 02/10/21 06:06PM
laura.loli said:
The kidnapped tag has 297 images and the kidnapping tag has 176. There's a wiki entry for kidnapping, so I think it's the correct one, so should all those images with kidnapped be changed to kidnapping? There's three pages of results for kidnapping -kidnapped, so there's a fair bit that aren't tagged with both.
The kidnapped tag has 297 images and the kidnapping tag has 176. There's a wiki entry for kidnapping, so I think it's the correct one, so should all those images with kidnapped be changed to kidnapping? There's three pages of results for kidnapping -kidnapped, so there's a fair bit that aren't tagged with both.
Danbooru only has a wiki page for kidnapping, just to expedite some of the process.
Posted on: 02/10/21 07:11PM
hot_springs, hot_spring, and hotspring are aliased to onsen.
Asking Danbo about kidnapping.
Asking Danbo about kidnapping.
Posted on: 02/11/21 05:08AM
I can see tag '2girls' on this picture: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1126078
I think it is for Roll and Roll Caskett.
But I can see also 2 other girls of significantly smaller size: Sera and Yuna. Shouldn't they also be taken in account (then '4girls' should be instead of '2girls')?
I think it is for Roll and Roll Caskett.
But I can see also 2 other girls of significantly smaller size: Sera and Yuna. Shouldn't they also be taken in account (then '4girls' should be instead of '2girls')?
Posted on: 02/11/21 10:03AM
schwarz-wohlf said:
I can see tag '2girls' on this picture: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1126078
I think it is for Roll and Roll Caskett.
But I can see also 2 other girls of significantly smaller size: Sera and Yuna. Shouldn't they also be taken in account (then '4girls' should be instead of '2girls')?
I can see tag '2girls' on this picture: gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=1126078
I think it is for Roll and Roll Caskett.
But I can see also 2 other girls of significantly smaller size: Sera and Yuna. Shouldn't they also be taken in account (then '4girls' should be instead of '2girls')?
Konbun doesn't have a gender so I'd say 5girls.
Posted on: 02/12/21 10:13AM
Hey.
I asked this before a few months ago, but could I be given an exception for the tag editing delay? I wasn't active on the site for a while, but I've been editing more the past few days.
Let me know, thanks.
I asked this before a few months ago, but could I be given an exception for the tag editing delay? I wasn't active on the site for a while, but I've been editing more the past few days.
Let me know, thanks.
Posted on: 02/14/21 04:35PM
Are tags like "no_panties" gender neutral or do they only work for female characters
Posted on: 02/14/21 05:38PM
pugsaremydrugs said:
Are tags like "no_panties" gender neutral or do they only work for female characters
Are tags like "no_panties" gender neutral or do they only work for female characters
no_briefs is a tag with a Danbo wiki but Danbo isn't using it, we are. no_panties says character not specifying male or female. Unless we make a change I don't think it matters.
Since we don't like having two tags for the same thing we might make a change. Maybe kill no_briefs using male search tags instead. We can also change all solo males to no_briefs or use no_panties for only trap/crossdressing males.
Can something be done for the very_dark_skin tag?
Posted on: 02/15/21 05:32AM
It seems really subjective. The wiki for it references the Von Luschan scale and states that 27-36 can qualify. I believe that only 33-36 should be considered however. Furthermore who even uses the Von Luschan scale anyway? The Wikipedia entry itself claims it is outdated.
My point is a fair amount of images seem improperly tagged with it. I can't really blame the wiki entry due to the ambiguity of the tag itself. Not to mention I am unsure of how many others use the wiki entries anyway.
My point is a fair amount of images seem improperly tagged with it. I can't really blame the wiki entry due to the ambiguity of the tag itself. Not to mention I am unsure of how many others use the wiki entries anyway.
Add Reply