gelbooru.com/index.php?page=wiki&s=view&id=6645

Gotta work on the spatula hands, coloring, shading, linework.

Hi,

Pic was generated by ai and this was indicated in the tags.
Considering it was doing very well score wise what exact part doesn't fit the standard here : gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9606849 ?

Thank you

That looked pretty good. Did you you retouched the ai generated result?

Yup, especially the eyes, but pretty much manually clean everything I thought was wrong.

There are a few artifacts in places that a lot of people might not have looked, mostly around the movement lines. The movement line goes weird when it runs into one of the creases on the right armpit. It also created a weird fleshy blob on the right thigh. The line itself is melted around the right knee. There's also a weird blob under the left ear, and close to the same position, the hair lines go weird.

Our standard is that it must be indistinguishable from human-drawn art. This is meant literally. If any artifacts from the AI generation process can be found, even if they're small and in a place where most viewers wouldn't notice or even look at, then those artifacts can be used to distinguish it from human-drawn art, and thus it is not indistinguishable.

By the way, the "ai-generated" tag is only for images that were completely AI-generated. If any touch-ups were done by a human, it's "ai-assisted" instead. These two tags are mutually exclusive.

Good job. I think that one can be restored, we'll see if the mods agree. Next time just tag it as ai-assisted.

Edit: Well, I guess not.

Thanx for the detailed answer. Funny that two of the weirdness were manual mistakes. Don't like calling "AI assisted" something that is 90% ai and 10% manual but well, I'll comply if I try again later.

My post was not AI-generated. But also a hand made drawing. And I know yall are fine with horror stuff.

gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=9646758

I am posting this again because this is very clearly not AI generated. And no one has provided an explanation as to why, strong evidence that this was clearly a mistake and nothing more. The video is of extremely high quality and clearly does not have the artifacts that AI images tend to have.

post #9556010
video-cdn3.gelbooru.com/i...50ba89acfee8c3e40ae3.webm

Here is the "evidence" I could compile as quickly as possible.

1. The artist has been doing 3D art before AI art was a thing. He has uploaded 3D art in early 2022, before AI art truly "kicked in"

2. The artist's pixiv posts are not labeled "AI generated"

3. The artist occasionally posts WIP models on blender, showing unfinished models of the characters before the final product. Proving that it is not AI generated. The process between authentic art and AI art is completely different.

Please restore this post.

A moderator should at least attempt to act in an unbiased manner. This kind of action is immature, unbecoming, and incompatible with the idea of art preservation.
gelbooru.com/index.php?page=post&s=view&id=6246119