Now Viewing: New post rating: General (report misuse here)
Keep it civil, do not flame or bait other users. If you notice anything illegal or inappropriate being discussed, contact an administrator or moderator.
Quote
Posted on: 05/22/22 11:16PM
SadSap said:
An ESRB-inspired rating is a better approach. E for completely safe content (the "general" option), T for mildly risque content (the "sensitive/safe" option), M for strongly suggestive content (the "questionable" rating) and A for explicit content.
An ESRB-inspired rating is a better approach. E for completely safe content (the "general" option), T for mildly risque content (the "sensitive/safe" option), M for strongly suggestive content (the "questionable" rating) and A for explicit content.
Good idea. But we are copying this stuff from Dan. So, we have no voice in this stuff. And it seems that they have already implemented the changes in their side.
Posted on: 05/22/22 11:17PM
starking said:
Why not? What does it do that you prefer us not to do it?
AngryZapdos said:
What you're referring to as tag edits are actually post edits. Changing the rating, source, title or tags, and even deleting a post, all count as post edits and will make a new version. Even saving the post without actually editing anything will create a new, albeit empty, version (please try not to do this).
PietroSoft said:
By the way, rating modifications count as tag edits?
By the way, rating modifications count as tag edits?
What you're referring to as tag edits are actually post edits. Changing the rating, source, title or tags, and even deleting a post, all count as post edits and will make a new version. Even saving the post without actually editing anything will create a new, albeit empty, version (please try not to do this).
Why not? What does it do that you prefer us not to do it?
It creates an entry in the tag edits table, which clogs up the database, and makes more work for us when working the tag poisoning queue.
Posted on: 05/22/22 11:19PM
Jerl said:
It creates an entry in the tag edits table, which clogs up the database, and makes more work for us when working the tag poisoning queue.
It creates an entry in the tag edits table, which clogs up the database, and makes more work for us when working the tag poisoning queue.
Shiet. I did it like 20 times tops. I swear.
Posted on: 05/22/22 11:48PM
retsupurae said:
But rating:safe exists.
But rating:safe exists.
Somebody didn't read the OP.
...
I agree with this change.
I've seen way too much "Safe" content that I was asking myself, "We see the stitch line of this swimsuit go right in the middle where her pussy is. that's 'safe'?!" (does not necessarily make a cameltoe but strongly implies sexual connotations).
So, having a difference showing the 100% safe content and content that suggest some sexualization, I agree. Now, if I didn't have to wait 30s between each edit, I might find some time to help.
Posted on: 05/23/22 12:02AM
Trala123 said:
...
...
Yeah, I noticed that problem too. Too many cameltoes with the safe rating. Also too many sexy bikinis and clothing with the safe rating. The cooldown is 10 seconds.
_________
Some calibration here, tell me if I am wrong.
Kirby: General
Kirby with a nice pair of titties in a bikini: Sensitive
Kirby with titties going topless: Questionable
Kirby is getting banged: Explicit
Amirite?
Posted on: 05/23/22 12:12AM
2 questions:
1. Will the new rating:sensitive tag still be aliased to rating:safe? I see the ratings under posts still say safei stead of sensitive, editing tags calls it "safe (sensitive)", and uploading new posts just says sensitive. I'm wondering if the current formatting is because the rating is new, or if that's just how it'll be for the foreseeable future, because right now there's some minor inconsistencies.
2. This has been something I've just dealt with for a while since it wasn't a big deal, but will searching rating:general/sensitive/questionable/explicit be able to be autofilled as metadata tags in the search bar again? I don't know why the autofill for searching rating tags was removed in like late 2020/early 2021, but manually typing was fine besides when I fat fingered a typo when typing questionable. Now, if safe isn't aliased to sensitive in the future, I can see myself fat fingering typos in the word sensitive a lot, so I think adding back autofill for rating tags will be pretty helpful.
1. Will the new rating:sensitive tag still be aliased to rating:safe? I see the ratings under posts still say safei stead of sensitive, editing tags calls it "safe (sensitive)", and uploading new posts just says sensitive. I'm wondering if the current formatting is because the rating is new, or if that's just how it'll be for the foreseeable future, because right now there's some minor inconsistencies.
2. This has been something I've just dealt with for a while since it wasn't a big deal, but will searching rating:general/sensitive/questionable/explicit be able to be autofilled as metadata tags in the search bar again? I don't know why the autofill for searching rating tags was removed in like late 2020/early 2021, but manually typing was fine besides when I fat fingered a typo when typing questionable. Now, if safe isn't aliased to sensitive in the future, I can see myself fat fingering typos in the word sensitive a lot, so I think adding back autofill for rating tags will be pretty helpful.
Posted on: 05/23/22 12:25AM
1. It will be called "Sensitive" everywhere eventually.
2. The tag suggestions box only lists actual tags. Ratings showing up in the suggestions was because someone added the literal text "rating:safe" (and the others) to posts as a tag. This could cause problems in the backend, so they were removed.
2. The tag suggestions box only lists actual tags. Ratings showing up in the suggestions was because someone added the literal text "rating:safe" (and the others) to posts as a tag. This could cause problems in the backend, so they were removed.
Posted on: 05/23/22 04:02AM
PietroSoft said:
Some calibration here, tell me if I am wrong.
Kirby: General
Kirby with a nice pair of titties in a bikini: Sensitive
Kirby with titties going topless: Questionable
Kirby is getting banged: Explicit
Some calibration here, tell me if I am wrong.
Kirby: General
Kirby with a nice pair of titties in a bikini: Sensitive
Kirby with titties going topless: Questionable
Kirby is getting banged: Explicit
The only Thing questionable about Kirby going topless is why would anyone draw such a thing. No, pietro if there are exposed tits it’s definitely not questionable it explicit. Questionable is Kirby with a cameltoe.
And jerl this is going to be booru wide?
Posted on: 05/23/22 04:08AM
starking said:
No, Pietro if there are exposed tits it’s definitely not questionable it explicit.
No, Pietro if there are exposed tits it’s definitely not questionable it explicit.
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...ng%3aquestionable+nipples But there are so many exposed titties with the questionable rating.
Posted on: 05/23/22 05:53AM
PietroSoft said:
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...ng%3aquestionable+nipples But there are so many exposed titties with the questionable rating.
But Kirby and titties go really well together. post #4989403
starking said:
No, Pietro if there are exposed tits it’s definitely not questionable it explicit.
No, Pietro if there are exposed tits it’s definitely not questionable it explicit.
gelbooru.com/index.php?pa...ng%3aquestionable+nipples But there are so many exposed titties with the questionable rating.
It just goes to show that people were a bit lazy when they were uploading and how many posts need fixing.
Add Reply