Posted on: 02/01/24 06:16PM
supremz said:
I would rather live in a world where people are told not to objectify women, even to a ridiculous degree, than one where they are told that they should.
Ehhhhhhhhhhhhh I'd be a little careful with that. And it really depends on what you mean "not objectifying women" though. Because going by a feminist cunt's definition of "not objectifying women" and applying that as a global law could still be a total hellhole to live in, even if it's the more moral option compared to the inverse. Imagine simply checking out a woman, and some unsightly freak blows the rape whistle on you, and you're arrested for it. Or posting about how hot a woman is online, and it being treated like a serious rape threat that would get you banned or in legal trouble.
With that said, I feel like it’s almost impossible to get laid if you’re entirely too respectful to a girl. It makes things like body language, flirting, etc. too difficult. And even if I agree with some moral standards more than others, that doesn’t mean I want a bunch of fascists shoving them down our throats.
I wouldn't say "entirely too respectful to a girl", it's more like being brainwashed and paralyzed with fear of wrongthink (or just being a wretched asshole). I really don't think the people who are extremely concerned with objectifying women to an unhealthy degree, are getting laid in the first place. It would be like expecting a militant vegan to finish a whole steak in front of others.
As for stuff like porn and video games, I think that plays equally an important role in society as actual sex, because it is a good teaching tool, inspires fantasies, etc. The religious puritains have an eerie resemblence to Orwell’s worst nightmare imaginable, where the world is devoid of all pleasure, sex is only for the sake of reproducing more workers, etc.
Sad, but true.