Squishy<3 commented at 2011-01-22 01:49:06 » #590910

One lucky bastard.

12 Points Flag

StonedEmo commented at 2011-01-22 03:27:50 » #591001

got that right

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-01-22 23:46:27 » #591985

yeah he is

1 Points Flag

Itsuka commented at 2011-03-25 20:35:10 » #668267

Immeasurably lucky bastard is more like it

4 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-07-01 13:29:16 » #793196

Helpful hint: Ninety-nine point fucking nine percent of images with "that one lucky guy" are not yuri.

Suffice to say, this does not fall in the 0.1%.

2 Points Flag

Anonymous commented at 2011-07-13 01:06:54 » #809193

I disagree. Yuri just refers to female on female sexual behavior. This image contains such behavior. I see no reason why it has to be exclusively female on female. If a picture showed a lesbian couple and a gay couple, it isn't bisexual, it merely contains both yuri and yaoi. It doesn't matter how many females there are or males, it matters what those females and males are doing. There's also what the viewer is searching for to take into account. If a viewer wants to see female on female action, I'm sure they'd appreciate this pic because it contains that. Yes, it also contains heterosexual content, but that's beside the point. The point is that the idea that a pic has to contain exclusively homosexual content to have the homosexual tag is flawed. So is the use of the bisexual tag. Bisexual is when a female gropes boobs while getting fucked, not when one female is groping boobs and happens to be nearby another female getting fucked. Neither female in that case is necessarily bisexual. I'm getting really sick of the whole "don't tag it yuri unless there's no males in the picture" attitude. Some people want to see girl on girl action and don't care if a guy is present.

6 Points Flag

Daijin commented at 2013-02-20 07:24:16 » #1269267

This does get the bisexual tag, not the yuri tag. This is our tag policy and that's what matters.

0 Points Flag