Ticket Information - ID: #1099
| ID: | Category: | Severity | Reproducibility | Date Submitted | Updated By: |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0001099 | Bug Reporting | Low | always | 02/18/21 10:19PM | BRANLIX2000 |
|
|
| Summary: | OR search doing strange things |
| Description: | It has to be a search of this form : {tag_1 ~ ... ~ tag_n} -{tag_A -tag_B} with n between 2 and 8 (didn't test with more but i guess it's the same) ex: {tag_1 ~ tag_2 ~ tag_3} -{tag_A -tag_B} This results in images that have at least one the tags of the {tag_1 ~ ... ~ tag_n} branch of the search AND that doesn't have the tag_A and not the tag_B at the same time (so there is still tag_A images, but only when there is tag_B with it) . In the end, it seems like both {tag_1 ~ ... ~ tag_n} and -{tag_A -tag_B} "work" However, if we do the same search but without the {tag_1 ~ ... ~ tag_n} branch, then the results will completly ignore the -{tag_A -tag_B}, as if it didn't exist. I hope I explained it well enough. |
| Additional Info: | putting {tag_1 ~ ... ~ tag_n} is the only way i've found to make -{tag_A -tag_B} work also, -{-tag_A tag_B} doesn't work. |
lozertuser replied at 2021-02-19 12:47:28  |
| -{tag_A -tag_B} This isn't valid syntax. |
lozertuser replied at 2021-02-19 12:49:35 |
| I'm unsure what you are asking for, but it seems like something like, you could do {tag1 ~ tag2 ~ tag3 ~...} -tag18 -tag19 |
BRANLIX2000 replied at 2021-02-19 14:39:05 |
| uhh well, it's not actually a problem, just something curious I stumbled upon. So -{tag_A -tag_B} is not supposed to work, sad. well, the thing is, it does have an effect on search when there is something like {tag1 ~ tag2 ~ tag3 ~...} with it in the search. it shows images that isn't "tag_A -tag_B"; without imposing the presence of any the said tags. It just removes images that have tag_A and not tag_B from the results. and, not gonna lie, like I kinda like using it, since I don't think it is possible to reproduce it with OR search, since OR searches don't realy like hypens My point was just to point it out, as I found curious that it has effects in that specific case, and not otherwise, so I thought it was maybe a bug or something like that. I'm sorry if I didn't manage to make it clear enough |
